Candecca Resources Ltd v Bishop [1998] UKEAT 1083_98_2711 (27 November 1998)
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude that the applicant could be compensated for loss of earnings up to the date he obtained permanent employment, and the review decision properly revoked the basic award and revised the compensatory award in accordance with statutory provisions and case law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 1083_98_2711
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Bishop; Respondent: Candecca Resources Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Review Decision
- Outcome
- First ground of appeal dismissed; remaining grounds to proceed to full hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Compensatory Award, Basic Award, Review Procedure, Mitigation of Loss
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Bishop
Applicant
Candecca Resources Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in revising the compensatory award on review
- 2 Whether the Tribunal misapplied section 120 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 regarding the basic award
- 3 Whether the chain of causation was broken by agency or permanent employment
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to conclude that the applicant could be compensated for loss of earnings up to the date he obtained permanent employment, and the review decision properly revoked the basic award and revised the compensatory award in accordance with statutory provisions and case law.
Court Disposition
First ground of appeal dismissed; remaining grounds to proceed to full hearing.
Orders
- Case to be listed for half a day, category C, for full inter partes hearing.
- Exchange of skeleton arguments between parties, to be lodged at least 14 days before the hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment