Boorman v Dorsett & Anor [1997] UKEAT 1368_96_2802 (28 February 1997)

Boorman v Dorsett & Anor [1997] UKEAT 1368_96_2802 (28 February 1997)

There was evidence before the Tribunal permitting the conclusion that Mr Boorman was the employer; no error of law or perversity was found in the Tribunal's decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] UKEAT 1368_96_2802
Parties
Appellant: Mr Boorman; Applicant: Ms Dorsett; Applicant: Mrs Gibbs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 February 1997
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Outstanding Pay, Employer Status, Appeal Procedure
Employment Law Outstanding Pay Employer Status Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Boorman

Appellant

Ms Dorsett

Applicant

Mrs Gibbs

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Boorman was the employer of the applicants
  2. 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in finding for the applicants

Ratio Decidendi

There was evidence before the Tribunal permitting the conclusion that Mr Boorman was the employer; no error of law or perversity was found in the Tribunal's decision.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal is dismissed.