Bruce & Ors v Nathan & Co [1995] UKEAT 192_95_1710 (17 October 1995)
The applicants had a good and satisfactory excuse for the delay, as they had expressly instructed their solicitors to appeal and reasonably believed the solicitors would act once the written reasons were received. The Tribunal's unusual failure to send the written reasons to the solicitors constituted exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of time.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 192_95_1710
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Bruce; Appellant: Mr McMahon; Appellant: Mr Phillips; Respondent: Nathan & Co
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Bruce
Appellant
Mr McMahon
Appellant
Mr Phillips
Appellant
Nathan & Co
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants had a good excuse for failing to file a notice of appeal within the prescribed time
- 2 Whether the circumstances justified the exceptional step of granting an extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants had a good and satisfactory excuse for the delay, as they had expressly instructed their solicitors to appeal and reasonably believed the solicitors would act once the written reasons were received. The Tribunal's unusual failure to send the written reasons to the solicitors constituted exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of time.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Extension of time to appeal granted to 13 October 1995
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment