Scotts Company(Uk) Ltd v. Budd [2001] UKEAT 0823_01_1611 (16 November 2001)
The matter is arguable as to whether the staff handbook varied the contract and the issue of notice entitlement requires a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0823_01_1611
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Budd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Matter to proceed to a full hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Notice, Variation of Contract, Employment Rights Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr Budd
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Budd's contractual notice entitlement was twelve weeks or three months under the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the staff handbook consensually varied the contract of employment
Ratio Decidendi
The matter is arguable as to whether the staff handbook varied the contract and the issue of notice entitlement requires a full hearing.
Court Disposition
Matter to proceed to a full hearing.
Orders
- Case listed for full hearing, category C, 2 hours with usual directions for skeleton arguments.
- Liberty to apply for Chairman's Notes if the other side disputes the record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment