Sanderson v Qinetiq Ltd [2003] UKEAT 1025_02_1701 (17 January 2003)
The Tribunal's findings were open to it based on the evidence; there was no unfavourable treatment or discrimination against the Applicant, and no reasonable Tribunal could have found otherwise. Allegations of bias were unsupported and the Tribunal extended hearing time to ensure fairness.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 1025_02_1701
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr C Sanderson; Respondent: Scientific research and development agency (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Bias in Tribunal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr C Sanderson
Appellant
Scientific research and development agency (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant was unlawfully discriminated against on racial grounds
- 2 Whether the Applicant was victimised for lodging a grievance
- 3 Whether the Tribunal exhibited bias or apparent bias
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings were open to it based on the evidence; there was no unfavourable treatment or discrimination against the Applicant, and no reasonable Tribunal could have found otherwise. Allegations of bias were unsupported and the Tribunal extended hearing time to ensure fairness.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No further orders; Tribunal decision stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment