Coles v National Trust [1998] UKEAT 27_98_2807 (28 July 1998)
The Industrial Tribunal's reasons for finding vexatious conduct and for the amount of the costs order were inadequate; the matter must be remitted for reconsideration with proper reasons.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 27_98_2807
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Coles; Respondent: National Trust
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to the extent of remitting the costs issue for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Costs Orders, Industrial Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Mr Coles
Appellant
National Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in ordering costs against the appellant on the basis of vexatious conduct
- 2 Whether adequate reasons were given for the costs order and its amount
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal's reasons for finding vexatious conduct and for the amount of the costs order were inadequate; the matter must be remitted for reconsideration with proper reasons.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to the extent of remitting the costs issue for reconsideration.
Orders
- The question of costs is remitted to the Industrial Tribunal for reconsideration in light of this judgment and the Marler decision.
- The Industrial Tribunal must provide proper reasons for any costs order made on reconsideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment