Conway v Centre Point Trading (UK) Ltd & Ors [1998] UKEAT 33_98_1305 (13 May 1998)
The appeal was dismissed because the Industrial Tribunal correctly found that the companies were not associated employers under statute, so the periods of employment could not be aggregated, and the refusal to review did not disclose any arguable point of law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 33_98_1305
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Conway; Respondents: Centre Point Trading (UK) Ltd and others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Ex Parte Basis
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Continuous Employment, Associated Employers, Jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunal, Review of Tribunal Decisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Conway
Appellant
Centre Point Trading (UK) Ltd and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Ex Parte Basis
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in refusing a review of its decision on jurisdiction for unfair dismissal claim
- 2 Whether periods of employment with two companies could be aggregated for continuous employment
- 3 Whether the companies were associated employers under statute
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the Industrial Tribunal correctly found that the companies were not associated employers under statute, so the periods of employment could not be aggregated, and the refusal to review did not disclose any arguable point of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no further action ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment