Williamson v. Schenker Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1445_00_2303 (23 March 2001)
The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that there was no variation of the original oral contract and that Mrs Edwards did not have or exercise authority to vary it; thus, the cessation of overpaid allowances did not constitute an unlawful deduction of wages. No error of law was identified in the Tribunal's approach or findings.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1445_00_2303
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr D A Williamson; Respondent: Schenker Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deduction of Wages, Variation of Contract, Employment Rights Act 1996, Authority of Employee Representatives, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr D A Williamson
Appellant
Schenker Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cessation of salary allowances constituted an unlawful deduction of wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether Mrs Edwards had authority to vary the employment contract
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in sitting alone despite factual disputes
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that there was no variation of the original oral contract and that Mrs Edwards did not have or exercise authority to vary it; thus, the cessation of overpaid allowances did not constitute an unlawful deduction of wages. No error of law was identified in the Tribunal's approach or findings.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment