Mr D Gemmell v Stirling Council (Scotland : Working Time Regulations) [2019] UKET 4112989/2014 (11 March 2019)

The Tribunal found that Stirling Council did not breach the Working Time Regulations in respect of Mr D Gemmell's employment, as the evidence showed compliance with statutory requirements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 4112989/2014
Parties: Applicant: Mr D Gemmell; Respondent: Stirling Council
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 11 March 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr D Gemmell

Applicant

Stirling Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Stirling Council breached the Working Time Regulations in relation to Mr D Gemmell's employment

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Stirling Council did not breach the Working Time Regulations in respect of Mr D Gemmell's employment, as the evidence showed compliance with statutory requirements.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.