Solargen Energy Ltd v Mr Daniel Clarke (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12430 (16 April 2013)

Solargen Energy Ltd v Mr Daniel Clarke (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12430 (16 April 2013)

The Panel found that the complainant had established rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2013] DRS 12430
Parties
Complainant: Solargen Energy Ltd; Respondent: Mr Daniel Clarke
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solargen Energy Ltd

Complainant

Mr Daniel Clarke

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had established rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.