Dass v London Guildhall University [1998] UKEAT 664_98_0110 (1 October 1998)
There are arguable points of law regarding whether the tribunal sufficiently considered the possibility of racial discrimination and victimisation, warranting a full hearing on all three grounds.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 664_98_0110
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Dass; Respondent: University (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr Dass
Appellant
University (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding no unlawful racial discrimination by Mr Ludi against Mr Dass
- 2 Whether the appointment process for Mr Ford gave rise to an inference of racial discrimination
- 3 Whether the tribunal misdirected itself on causation in the victimisation complaint
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable points of law regarding whether the tribunal sufficiently considered the possibility of racial discrimination and victimisation, warranting a full hearing on all three grounds.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted
Orders
- Full hearing to be held on all three grounds of appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment