University of Strathclyde v Hastie & Anor [2005] DRS 02119 (12 January 2004)
The complainant has rights in the name 'University of Strathclyde' identical to the domain name, and the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration by creating a likelihood of confusion and offering the domain for sale for a substantial sum.
- Citation
- [2005] DRS 02119
- Parties
- Complainant: The University of Strathclyde; Respondent: Mr David Hastie; Respondent: Clydeside Promotions Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute (nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service) / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The University of Strathclyde
Complainant
Mr David Hastie
Respondent
Clydeside Promotions Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service) / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name, in the hands of the respondent, is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the name 'University of Strathclyde' identical to the domain name, and the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration by creating a likelihood of confusion and offering the domain for sale for a substantial sum.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
Orders
- The domain name universityofstrathclyde.co.uk is to be transferred to The University of Strathclyde.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment