Skirmish Ltd v Mr David Manning (Full Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 10863 (26 April 2012)

Skirmish Ltd v Mr David Manning (Full Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 10863 (26 April 2012)

The complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an Abusive Registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2012] DRS 10863
Parties
Complainant: Skirmish Ltd; Respondent: Mr David Manning
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Skirmish Ltd

Complainant

Mr David Manning

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the domain name was abusive
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an Abusive Registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name