Deane v London Borough Of Ealing & Anor [1992] UKEAT 33_91_2411 (24 November 1992)
The award for injury to feelings was too low and should be increased to £1,000; aggravated damages of £250 were within the proper range; exemplary damages are not available for statutory torts under the Race Relations Act 1976; damages are properly awarded against the employer, not the individual employee acting in the course of employment.
- Citation
- [1992] UKEAT 33_91_2411
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Deane; First Respondent: London Borough of Ealing; Second Respondent: Mr Bernard Crofton
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Industrial Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Damages, Aggravated Damages, Exemplary Damages, Injury to Feelings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Deane
Appellant
London Borough of Ealing
First Respondent
Mr Bernard Crofton
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Industrial Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award for injury to feelings and aggravated damages was perverse or too low
- 2 Whether exemplary damages could be awarded for statutory tort under the Race Relations Act 1976
- 3 Whether damages should be awarded against Mr Crofton personally
Ratio Decidendi
The award for injury to feelings was too low and should be increased to £1,000; aggravated damages of £250 were within the proper range; exemplary damages are not available for statutory torts under the Race Relations Act 1976; damages are properly awarded against the employer, not the individual employee acting in the course of employment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Award for injury to feelings increased from £500 to £1,000
- Total damages increased accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment