Deman v Leeds Metropolitan University & Ors [2003] UKEAT 0768_02_1401 (14 January 2003)
There was no evidence or reasonable inference of bias, discrimination, or victimisation by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal properly considered the facts, evidence, and law, and there is no reasonable prospect of success in any of the grounds of appeal.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0768_02_1401
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Deman; Respondent: Leeds Metropolitan University
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Bias in Tribunal Proceedings, Recruitment Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Deman
Appellant
Leeds Metropolitan University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal was biased against Mr Deman
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in dismissing claims of racial discrimination and victimisation
- 3 Whether the recruitment process was discriminatory or victimising
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence or reasonable inference of bias, discrimination, or victimisation by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal properly considered the facts, evidence, and law, and there is no reasonable prospect of success in any of the grounds of appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment