Cupid Plc v Mr Derek McComisky (Summary Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 10929 (19 March 2012)

Cupid Plc v Mr Derek McComisky (Summary Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 10929 (19 March 2012)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2012] DRS 10929
Parties
Complainant: Cupid Plc; Respondent: Mr Derek McComisky
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cupid Plc

Complainant

Mr Derek McComisky

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name