Doddridge v. Associated British Ports [2000] UKEAT 699_00_1506 (15 June 2000)
The Tribunal erred in law by refusing disclosure of documents on the sole ground of relevance where the Respondent's own pleadings made those documents relevant. The first five categories of documents, as well as requests (7) and (8), are relevant and must be disclosed. Request (6) may be refused unless further justification is provided.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 699_00_1506
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Doddridge; Respondent: Associated British Ports
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Relevance of Documents, Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Doddridge
Appellant
Associated British Ports
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by refusing disclosure of documents on the ground of relevance.
- 2 Whether the requested documents are relevant to the material issues in the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by refusing disclosure of documents on the sole ground of relevance where the Respondent's own pleadings made those documents relevant. The first five categories of documents, as well as requests (7) and (8), are relevant and must be disclosed. Request (6) may be refused unless further justification is provided.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Order for disclosure of documents in categories (1) to (5), (7), and (8) as requested by Mr Doddridge.
- Parties to be heard on the timetable for compliance with the disclosure order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment