Drudge v Emap Apex Publications Ltd [1995] UKEAT 220_94_1905 (19 May 1995)
The Industrial Tribunal correctly found that consultation would not have changed the outcome and properly set-off the ex gratia payment against the compensatory award, extinguishing it, in accordance with Section 74(7) and binding precedent.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 220_94_1905
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Drudge; Respondent: EMAP APEX
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Compensatory Award, Ex Gratia Payment, Consultation Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Drudge
Appellant
EMAP APEX
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in not awarding a percentage award reflecting a chance of retention after consultation
- 2 Whether the ex gratia payment should be set-off against the compensatory award
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal correctly found that consultation would not have changed the outcome and properly set-off the ex gratia payment against the compensatory award, extinguishing it, in accordance with Section 74(7) and binding precedent.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Industrial Tribunal decision affirmed; no compensatory award payable due to set-off of ex gratia payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment