Finlay v Cyron & Others (Practice and Procedure : Service) [2011] UKEAT 0121_11_1410 (14 October 2011)
The appeal was dismissed because rule 61 (4) (h) did not apply to service for joinder, there was insufficient evidence of improper motive, and the claim of joint liability was not hopeless and should not be struck out without full factual determination.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0121_11_1410
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Finlay; Second Respondent: Beam Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Strike Out Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service of Proceedings, Joinder of Parties, Strike Out Applications, Joint Liability, Costs Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Finlay
Appellant
Beam Respondents
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Strike Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service was properly effected under Employment Tribunal Rules
- 2 Whether the application to join the Appellant was made for an improper motive
- 3 Whether the claim of joint liability had no reasonable prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because rule 61 (4) (h) did not apply to service for joinder, there was insufficient evidence of improper motive, and the claim of joint liability was not hopeless and should not be struck out without full factual determination.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No strike out of claim against Appellant
- No costs awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment