United Kingdom Judgment

Mr G Babikir v Designer Wedding Specialist Ltd T/a Saffron Events UK and Prestige Hospitality Ltd (Scotland : Breach of Contract) [2026] UKET 8002110/2024 (9 March 2026)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The tribunal found that the respondents failed to pay the claimant wages due under the contract without lawful justification, amounting to a breach of contract.

Court disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

  • Respondents to pay the claimant the sum of £2,400 as unpaid wages
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr G Babikir

Claimant

Designer Wedding Specialist Ltd T/a Saffron Events UK

Respondent

Prestige Hospitality Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Unpaid Wages Awarded: GBP 2,400

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Employment Tribunal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The claimant argued that the respondents failed to pay wages due under the employment contract, constituting a breach of contract.
Respondent
The respondents contended that the claimant was not entitled to the claimed sums due to alleged performance issues and disputed the existence of certain contractual terms.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Employment Rights Act 1996

    An employer must pay wages as agreed in the employment contract unless there is a lawful reason to withhold payment.

  2. 02

    Common Law

    A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform their obligations under the contract without lawful excuse.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondents failed to pay the claimant wages due under the contract without lawful justification, amounting to a breach of contract.

Court disposition

Claim upheld in part

  • Respondents to pay the claimant the sum of £2,400 as unpaid wages
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2026] UKET 8002110/2024

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> Mr G Babikir v Designer Wedding Specialist Ltd T/a Saffron Events UK and Prestige Hospitality Ltd (Scotland : Breach of Contract) [2026] UKET 8002110/2024 (9 March 2026) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKET/2026/8002110_2024.html Cite as: [2026] UKET 8002110/2024 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Mr G Babikir v Designer Wedding Specialist Ltd T/a Saffron Events UK and Prestige Hospitality Ltd (Scotland : Breach of Contract) [2026] UKET 8002110/2024 (9 March 2026) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2026] UKET 8002110/2024 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKET/2026/8002110_2024.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Employment Rights Act 1996

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.