Galloway v. Birmingham City Council & Ors [2001] UKEAT 504_01_1710 (17 October 2001)

Galloway v. Birmingham City Council & Ors [2001] UKEAT 504_01_1710 (17 October 2001)

The additional evidence from Mr Eastman would not have changed the Tribunal's decision to dismiss Mr Haynes as a Respondent, and there is no just and equitable basis to extend the time limit or remit the matter for reconsideration.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 504_01_1710
Parties
Appellant: Mr Galloway; Respondent: Mr Haynes; Respondent: Mr Eastman
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Time Limits, Discrimination, Dismissal of Respondent
Employment Law Time Limits Discrimination Dismissal of Respondent

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Galloway

Appellant

Mr Haynes

Respondent

Mr Eastman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether new evidence justifies reinstating Mr Haynes as a Respondent
  2. 2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend the time limit for proceedings against Mr Haynes

Ratio Decidendi

The additional evidence from Mr Eastman would not have changed the Tribunal's decision to dismiss Mr Haynes as a Respondent, and there is no just and equitable basis to extend the time limit or remit the matter for reconsideration.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage
  • No remission to Tribunal