Ganeshmoorthy v H R Smith (Technical Developments) Ltd [1995] UKEAT 510_94_0702 (7 February 1995)
The hearing was adjourned because the tribunal could not ascertain who was representing the appellant due to lack of proper notification from the solicitors involved.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 510_94_0702
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Ganeshmoorthy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Legal Representation, Procedural Fairness
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Legal Representation Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Mr Ganeshmoorthy
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the preliminary hearing can proceed in the absence of representation for the appellant
- 2 whether proper notification of change of solicitors was given to the tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The hearing was adjourned because the tribunal could not ascertain who was representing the appellant due to lack of proper notification from the solicitors involved.
Court Disposition
adjourned
Orders
- The preliminary hearing is adjourned.
- Letters to be sent to both firms of solicitors requesting written explanations regarding their representation of the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment