White & Anor v Troutbeck SA (Contract of Employment : Whether established) [2013] UKEAT 0177_12_2301 (23 January 2013)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by focusing on the absence of day-to-day control rather than whether the respondent retained a sufficient contractual right of control. The written agreement and the circumstances indicated that Troutbeck retained such a right, making the claimants employees under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0177_12_2301
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Gary White; Appellant: Ms Katy Todd; Respondent: Troutbeck SA
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contract of Employment, Worker Status, Control Test, Mutuality of Obligation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Gary White
Appellant
Ms Katy Todd
Appellant
Troutbeck SA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants were employees or workers under the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the respondent retained a sufficient right of control to establish a contract of employment
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by focusing on the absence of day-to-day control rather than whether the respondent retained a sufficient contractual right of control. The written agreement and the circumstances indicated that Troutbeck retained such a right, making the claimants employees under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- A finding is substituted that Mr White and Ms Todd were employees of Troutbeck.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment