EG Hockey Academy LLP v Mr Guy Workman (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17299 (06 September 2016)

EG Hockey Academy LLP v Mr Guy Workman (Full Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17299 (06 September 2016)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17299
Parties
Complainant: EG Hockey Academy LLP; Respondent: Mr Guy Workman
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
06 September 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Abusive Registration, Nominet DRS Policy
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Dispute Abusive Registration Nominet DRS Policy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EG Hockey Academy LLP

Complainant

Mr Guy Workman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action taken; domain name remains with respondent