Bhatty v. Miller Group Ltd [2001] UKEAT 114_01_1506 (15 June 2001)

Bhatty v. Miller Group Ltd [2001] UKEAT 114_01_1506 (15 June 2001)

There was no error of law in the Tribunal's calculation of compensation, its assessment of the period of loss, or its award for injury to feelings. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence, made reasonable inferences, and applied correct legal principles. The appeal disclosed no arguable error of law and was dismissed at the preliminary stage.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 114_01_1506
Parties
Appellant: Mr H Bhatty; Respondent: The Miller Group Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Remedies, Compensation Calculation
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Remedies Compensation Calculation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr H Bhatty

Appellant

The Miller Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in its calculation of compensation for race discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence regarding employment and earnings
  3. 3 Whether there was a contradiction between the liability and remedies decisions

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error of law in the Tribunal's calculation of compensation, its assessment of the period of loss, or its award for injury to feelings. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence, made reasonable inferences, and applied correct legal principles. The appeal disclosed no arguable error of law and was dismissed at the preliminary stage.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing
  • No error of law found in Tribunal's decision