Hirani v Dome Cosmetics Ltd [1998] UKEAT 73_98_0110 (1 October 1998)

Given the appellant's bona fide attempt to file on time and supporting evidence, it is a proper exercise of discretion to extend time in the interests of justice.

Citation: [1998] UKEAT 73_98_0110
Parties: Appellant: Mr Hirani; Respondents: Respondents
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 October 1998
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Order Refusing Extension of Time
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Procedural Fairness

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr Hirani

Appellant

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Order Refusing Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether time for lodging Notice of Appeal should be extended by one day

Ratio Decidendi

Given the appellant's bona fide attempt to file on time and supporting evidence, it is a proper exercise of discretion to extend time in the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Time for lodging Notice of Appeal extended by one day