Hothi v. Smurfit Tubes Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1297_00_0405 (4 May 2001)

Hothi v. Smurfit Tubes Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1297_00_0405 (4 May 2001)

The appeal was dismissed because it raised no point of law or perversity, only disagreement with factual findings, and there was no evidence of bias by the Employment Tribunal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1297_00_0405
Parties
Appellant: Mr Hothi
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Trade Union Rights, Bias
Employment Law Discrimination Law Unfair Dismissal Wrongful Dismissal Race Discrimination Victimisation Trade Union Rights Bias

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Hothi

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the Employment Tribunal erred in dismissing claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, race discrimination, victimisation, and breach of trade union rights
  2. 2 whether there was bias in the conduct of the Employment Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because it raised no point of law or perversity, only disagreement with factual findings, and there was no evidence of bias by the Employment Tribunal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed