Hussain v. City Living (Leeds) (t/a Morgans) & Ors [2000] UKEAT 387_00_0507 (5 July 2000)

Hussain v. City Living (Leeds) (t/a Morgans) & Ors [2000] UKEAT 387_00_0507 (5 July 2000)

The Tribunal directed itself properly in law, considered all relevant evidence, and there was no arguable case of perversity or error of law.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 387_00_0507
Parties
Appellant: Mr Hussain; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent; Respondent: Third Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Tribunal Procedure, Perversity Appeal
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Tribunal Procedure Perversity Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Hussain

Appellant

First Respondent

Respondent

Second Respondent

Respondent

Third Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal's finding was perverse
  2. 2 Whether there were errors of law in the Tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal directed itself properly in law, considered all relevant evidence, and there was no arguable case of perversity or error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; Tribunal decision stands