Indrayen v Shadowgrade Developments Ltd [1996] UKEAT 983_95_0105 (1 May 1996)

No arguable error of law found in tribunal's exercise of discretion to refuse amendment, review, and postponement; appeals dismissed as points raised are not reasonably arguable questions of law.

Citation: [1996] UKEAT 983_95_0105
Parties: Appellant: Mr Indrayen; Respondent: Shadowgrade Developments Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 May 1996
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome: appeals dismissed
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Amendment of Pleadings, Review of Tribunal Decision, Costs

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Breach of Contract Amendment of Pleadings Review of Tribunal Decision Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr Indrayen

Appellant

Shadowgrade Developments Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

1 Whether the tribunal erred in refusing amendment to include unfair dismissal claim
2 Whether the tribunal erred in refusing review to admit new evidence
3 Whether the tribunal erred in refusing postponement and awarding costs

Ratio Decidendi

No arguable error of law found in tribunal's exercise of discretion to refuse amendment, review, and postponement; appeals dismissed as points raised are not reasonably arguable questions of law.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

Appeals EAT/983/95, EAT/1104/95, and EAT/107/96 dismissed
Applicant ordered to pay £150 towards respondent's costs in EAT/107/96