Batsford Foundation v Mr J Miller (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17625 (23 July 2016)

Batsford Foundation v Mr J Miller (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17625 (23 July 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17625
Parties
Complainant: Batsford Foundation; Respondent: Mr J Miller
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Batsford Foundation

Complainant

Mr J Miller

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the disputed domain name by the respondent was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name