Jackson v Birmingham City Council [1995] UKEAT 167_94_0703 (7 March 1995)
The Tribunal's findings that there was no less favourable treatment of the Appellant on racial grounds, and that the panel's knowledge of his previous complaints did not influence their decision, were findings of fact open to them on the evidence. There was no error of law or wrong approach in law by the Tribunal.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 167_94_0703
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Jackson; Respondent: Birmingham City Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Direct Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Jackson
Appellant
Birmingham City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant was subjected to direct racial discrimination during an interview for a team manager position
- 2 Whether the interview panel's knowledge of the Appellant's previous complaints influenced their decision
- 3 Whether the panel's failure to use scoring or assessment forms constituted unfair treatment
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings that there was no less favourable treatment of the Appellant on racial grounds, and that the panel's knowledge of his previous complaints did not influence their decision, were findings of fact open to them on the evidence. There was no error of law or wrong approach in law by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment