Edusei v Ledwith & Anor [1997] UKEAT 1326_95_2702 (27 February 1997)
The Chairman had jurisdiction to determine the preliminary issue sitting alone and to receive oral evidence under Rule 6(1) of the 1993 Regulations; the complaint was presented out of time and there was no basis to extend time; the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 1326_95_2702
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Javaid; Respondents: Cable Corporation (first respondent) and Mr Ledwith (second respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Chairman's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Time Limits for Claims, Jurisdiction of Tribunal Chairmen, Preliminary Issues, Industrial Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Javaid
Appellant
Cable Corporation (first respondent) and Mr Ledwith (second respondent)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Chairman's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complaint was presented out of time under Section 68(1) of the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether it was just and equitable to extend time under Section 68(5)
- 3 Whether the Chairman had jurisdiction to determine the preliminary issue sitting alone under Rule 6 of the 1993 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Chairman had jurisdiction to determine the preliminary issue sitting alone and to receive oral evidence under Rule 6(1) of the 1993 Regulations; the complaint was presented out of time and there was no basis to extend time; the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment