Leeks v Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 298 (GRC) (06 March 2023)
The requested information, though statistical, is personal data as disclosure could identify individuals in a small team and reveal special category data (sexual orientation). Section 40(2) FOIA provides an absolute exemption where disclosure would breach data protection principles. There is no lawful basis for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 298 (GRC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr. Jeffery Leeks; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Financial Ombudsman Service
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Personal Data, Special Category Data, Statistical Data Disclosure, Section 40(2) FOIA Exemption
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Jeffery Leeks
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Financial Ombudsman Service
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requested statistical data constitutes personal data under FOIA and DPA 2018
- 2 Whether disclosure would breach data protection principles under section 40(2) FOIA
- 3 Whether public interest considerations apply to an absolute exemption under section 40(2) FOIA
Ratio Decidendi
The requested information, though statistical, is personal data as disclosure could identify individuals in a small team and reveal special category data (sexual orientation). Section 40(2) FOIA provides an absolute exemption where disclosure would breach data protection principles. There is no lawful basis for disclosure, and public interest is irrelevant to the absolute exemption. The appeal is dismissed as there is no error of law in the Commissioner's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment