HM Prison Services & Ors v Johnson [1996] UKEAT 1033_95_1902 (19 February 1996)
The Tribunal was entitled to infer victimisation from the evidence, and the reasoning supporting the finding of unlawful discrimination was sound; no arguable point of law arises on liability.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 1033_95_1902
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Johnson; First Respondent: Mr Armitage; Second Respondent: Mr Marsden; Third Respondent: Prison Service
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Liability appeal dismissed; leave granted for quantum issues to proceed to full hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Aggravated Damages, Injury to Feelings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Johnson
Applicant
Mr Armitage
First Respondent
Mr Marsden
Second Respondent
Prison Service
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in finding unlawful race discrimination and victimisation against the Applicant
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's awards for injury to feelings and aggravated damages were appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to infer victimisation from the evidence, and the reasoning supporting the finding of unlawful discrimination was sound; no arguable point of law arises on liability.
Court Disposition
Liability appeal dismissed; leave granted for quantum issues to proceed to full hearing.
Orders
- Liability appeal dismissed.
- Quantum issues to proceed to full hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment