Jones v. Computer People Midlands & Anor [2000] UKEAT 928_00_1512 (15 December 2000)
There is no free-standing right of complaint for failure to comply with the Code of Practice under the DDA; failure to provide job descriptions did not amount to unlawful discrimination or failure to make reasonable adjustments; the tribunal's findings were not perverse and were within its discretion.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 928_00_1512
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Jones; First Respondent: Computer People; Second Respondent: Astra Zeneca
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Code of Practice, Perversity in Tribunal Findings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Jones
Appellant
Computer People
First Respondent
Astra Zeneca
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to have or communicate anti-discrimination policies constitutes unlawful discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether failure to provide job descriptions or person specifications amounts to unlawful discrimination or failure to make reasonable adjustments
- 3 Whether the tribunal's findings were perverse
Ratio Decidendi
There is no free-standing right of complaint for failure to comply with the Code of Practice under the DDA; failure to provide job descriptions did not amount to unlawful discrimination or failure to make reasonable adjustments; the tribunal's findings were not perverse and were within its discretion.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment