Peters v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE : Other) [2018] UKFTT 187 (TC) (05 April 2018)
The seriousness of the delay and the need for efficient litigation and adherence to time limits outweigh the plausible but insufficiently evidenced reasons for the delay; the application for extension of time is refused.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 187 (TC)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Jones; Respondent: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Tax Assessments / Decision on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Case Management, Compliance With Procedural Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Jones
Applicant
HMRC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Tax Assessments / Decision on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal tax assessments
- 2 Whether the merits of the substantive appeal are relevant to the extension application
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the delay and the need for efficient litigation and adherence to time limits outweigh the plausible but insufficiently evidenced reasons for the delay; the application for extension of time is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment