Karim v Hilton International Ltd [1997] UKEAT 106_97_2606 (26 June 1997)
The letter of 22nd February 1995 was not intended as an Originating Application but as a request to amend; therefore, the tribunal was correct in refusing to treat it as a new application and in dismissing the subsequent application as out of time.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 106_97_2606
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Karim; Respondent: Hilton International Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Originating Application, Amendment of Complaint, Time Limits, Race Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Karim
Appellant
Hilton International Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a letter requesting to add a complaint can be treated as an Originating Application
- 2 Whether the tribunal erred in refusing to treat the letter as a fresh application
- 3 Whether the application was out of time under the Race Relations Act
Ratio Decidendi
The letter of 22nd February 1995 was not intended as an Originating Application but as a request to amend; therefore, the tribunal was correct in refusing to treat it as a new application and in dismissing the subsequent application as out of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No arguable point of law; tribunal decision upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment