National Westminster Bank plc v Rogers [2007] DRS 4625 (7 June 2007)
The complainant has established rights in the 'Natwest' mark, which is sufficiently similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent used the domain name for a fraudulent imitation website, unfairly disrupting the complainant's business and taking unfair advantage of its rights. The domain name is an abusive registration under paragraph 3(a)(i)(C) of the Policy.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4625
- Parties
- Complainant: National Westminster Bank plc; Respondent: Mr. Kenny Rogers
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Registration, Trademark Infringement, Abusive Registration, Phishing, Passing Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Westminster Bank plc
Complainant
Mr. Kenny Rogers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has established rights in the 'Natwest' mark, which is sufficiently similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent used the domain name for a fraudulent imitation website, unfairly disrupting the complainant's business and taking unfair advantage of its rights. The domain name is an abusive registration under paragraph 3(a)(i)(C) of the Policy.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- The domain name 'natwestuk-bank.co.uk' is to be transferred to National Westminster Bank plc.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment