Kufeji v. Kent County Constabulary [2000] UKEAT 166_2000_2302 (23 February 2000)
The appeal is dismissed because the passages sought to be reinstated as substantive complaints are derivative and circumvent the Chairman's unappealed order limiting complaints to incidents from 1997 onwards; only evidence relevant to permitted complaints may be admitted, not new substantive allegations.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 166_2000_2302
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Kufeji; Respondent: Chief Constable of Kent County Constabulary
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Time Limits, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Kufeji
Applicant
Chief Constable of Kent County Constabulary
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether allegations outside permitted time frame can be pursued as substantive complaints
- 2 Whether evidence of pre-1997 incidents can be admitted for other purposes
- 3 Whether paragraph 8 and paragraph 11 of amended grounds can be reinstated
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the passages sought to be reinstated as substantive complaints are derivative and circumvent the Chairman's unappealed order limiting complaints to incidents from 1997 onwards; only evidence relevant to permitted complaints may be admitted, not new substantive allegations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave granted to amend grounds for complaint to include only paragraphs 5(t) to (z) of Chairman's August 1999 decision and the additional allegation regarding DS Simmonds' refusals in 1997.
- Draft order to be lodged reflecting counsel's agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment