Agus v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 425 (TC) (09 September 2010)
The Tribunal found that the Appellant was not trading on his own account as a concert promoter; all reliable evidence demonstrated that WYLEL was the promoter and incurred the losses. The Appellant was therefore not entitled to claim loss relief under section 380 ICTA 1988 for the sum of £100,000.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 425 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr L Agus; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Loss Relief, Self Assessment, Business Losses, Section 380 ICTA 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr L Agus
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant was entitled to claim loss relief under section 380 ICTA 1988 for losses arising from a failed concert promotion venture.
- 2 Whether the losses were incurred by the Appellant trading on his own account or by West Yorkshire Live Events Limited (WYLEL).
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Appellant was not trading on his own account as a concert promoter; all reliable evidence demonstrated that WYLEL was the promoter and incurred the losses. The Appellant was therefore not entitled to claim loss relief under section 380 ICTA 1988 for the sum of £100,000.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Appellant was not entitled to claim loss relief under section 380 ICTA 1988 in the sum of £100,000.
- The decision of HMRC amending the Appellant’s self assessment is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment