Lal v. Cooksons Precious Metals Ltd [2001] UKEAT 0853_01_3011 (30 November 2001)
The incidents complained of, individually or cumulatively, did not amount to a repudiatory breach by the respondent of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, and even if they did, the appellant did not act promptly in accepting the breach.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0853_01_3011
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Lal; Respondent: Cooksons Precious Metals
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Lal
Appellant
Cooksons Precious Metals
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed by the respondent
- 2 Whether the respondent committed a repudiatory breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- 3 Whether the appellant acted promptly in accepting any alleged breach
Ratio Decidendi
The incidents complained of, individually or cumulatively, did not amount to a repudiatory breach by the respondent of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, and even if they did, the appellant did not act promptly in accepting the breach.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment