Olsen Doors & Windows Ltd v Mr Lee Davenport (Full Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11309 (06 July 2012)

The panel found that the domain name was identical or similar to the complainant's name, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. The complainant satisfied all elements required under the Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2012] DRS 11309
Parties: Complainant: Olsen Doors & Windows Ltd; Respondent: Mr Lee Davenport
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 06 July 2012
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome: Transfer of domain name to complainant
Legal Topics: Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Trade Marks

Intellectual Property Information Technology Law Domain Name Disputes Passing Off Trade Marks

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Olsen Doors & Windows Ltd

Complainant

Mr Lee Davenport

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
3 Whether the domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Transfer of domain name to complainant

Orders

The domain name is to be transferred to Olsen Doors & Windows Ltd

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.