Lomas (Scaffolding) v. Greenhow [2001] UKEAT 1156_00_0604 (6 April 2001)

Lomas (Scaffolding) v. Greenhow [2001] UKEAT 1156_00_0604 (6 April 2001)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to participate in the original proceedings, did not file a response, and raised new arguments too late. The Tribunal's finding of redundancy and entitlement to payment stands.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1156_00_0604
Parties
Appellant: Mr Lomas; Respondent: Mr Greenhow
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
06 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Lomas

Appellant

Mr Greenhow

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to redundancy payment
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had standing to request extended reasons
  3. 3 Whether the dismissal was redundancy or sacking

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to participate in the original proceedings, did not file a response, and raised new arguments too late. The Tribunal's finding of redundancy and entitlement to payment stands.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed