Ms K Chapman v Mr M Dadkhah and Norfolk Healthcare Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2019] UKET 3335043/2018 (1 November 2019)

The tribunal found that the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract and that the claimant was entitled to damages for the loss suffered as a result of the breach.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 3335043/2018
Parties: Claimant: Ms K Chapman; Respondent: Mr M Dadkhah; Respondent: Norfolk Healthcare Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 November 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal Breach of Contract / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Employment Termination

Employment Law Contract Law Breach of Contract Employment Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms K Chapman

Claimant

Mr M Dadkhah

Respondent

Norfolk Healthcare Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Breach of Contract / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there was a breach of contract by the respondents
2 Whether the claimant is entitled to damages for breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract and that the claimant was entitled to damages for the loss suffered as a result of the breach.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondents to pay damages to the claimant for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.