Devonport Management Ltd v Cusack [1993] UKEAT 445_93_2012 (20 December 1993)
The Tribunal's finding that the dismissal was unfair was a finding of fact based on the totality of evidence available at the time of the appeal hearing; the employer could not reasonably conclude Mr Cusack was guilty of fraud given the fresh evidence, and there was no error of law or inconsistency with Burchell...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 445_93_2012
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr M E Cusack; Respondent: Devonport Management Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedures, Contributory Fault
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr M E Cusack
Applicant
Devonport Management Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Was Mr Cusack's dismissal unfair under employment law?
- 2 Did the employer act reasonably in concluding Mr Cusack was guilty of gross misconduct?
- 3 Was the Tribunal's finding perverse or inconsistent with legal principles?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that the dismissal was unfair was a finding of fact based on the totality of evidence available at the time of the appeal hearing; the employer could not reasonably conclude Mr Cusack was guilty of fraud given the fresh evidence, and there was no error of law or inconsistency with Burchell guidelines.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision of unfair dismissal upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment