Mahesan v. Arrogah [2000] UKEAT 671_00_2106 (21 June 2000)
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Mahesan had notice of the hearing, failed to attend without sufficient excuse, and could not demonstrate any error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's refusal to review its decision or in its substantive findings.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 671_00_2106
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Mahesan; Applicant: Mr Arrogah
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Unauthorised Wage Deductions, Tribunal Procedure, Review of Tribunal Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Mahesan
Appellant
Mr Arrogah
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing the application for review due to the appellant's absence
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's findings on race discrimination and wage deductions were legally flawed
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Mahesan had notice of the hearing, failed to attend without sufficient excuse, and could not demonstrate any error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's refusal to review its decision or in its substantive findings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision and compensation award stand.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment