Majid v Employment Service [1998] UKEAT 133_97_1510 (15 October 1998)
The Tribunal found no evidence that the Respondents' actions regarding promotion, substitution, or appraisals were motivated by racial discrimination or victimisation. The explanations provided were accepted as honest and reasonable, and the Appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof. The Tribunal's findings were not perverse or unsupported by evidence.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 133_97_1510
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Majid; Respondents: Employment Service
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Promotion, Substitution, Annual Appraisal, Bias
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Majid
Appellant
Employment Service
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents discriminated against the Appellant on grounds of race
- 2 Whether the Appellant was victimised for making a complaint of racial discrimination
- 3 Whether the Respondents' failure to promote, substitute, or mark appraisals constituted unlawful discrimination or victimisation
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found no evidence that the Respondents' actions regarding promotion, substitution, or appraisals were motivated by racial discrimination or victimisation. The explanations provided were accepted as honest and reasonable, and the Appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof. The Tribunal's findings were not perverse or unsupported by evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
- No further relief granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment