Comtec Enterprises Ltd v Corden (t/a Comtec) [2005] DRS 02204 (24 February 2005)
The term 'comtec' is both generic and wholly descriptive of the complainant's business and is widely used in the computer industry; therefore, the complainant cannot establish rights in the name under the DRS Policy, and the complaint fails at the first hurdle.
- Citation
- [2005] DRS 02204
- Parties
- Complainant: Comtec Enterprises Ltd; Respondent: Mr Mark Corden t/a Comtec (or Comtec Computers)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service (drs) Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Rights, Generic/descriptive Terms, Passing Off, Abusive Registration, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comtec Enterprises Ltd
Complainant
Mr Mark Corden t/a Comtec (or Comtec Computers)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service (drs) Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'comtec' identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'comtec' is both generic and wholly descriptive of the complainant's business and is widely used in the computer industry; therefore, the complainant cannot establish rights in the name under the DRS Policy, and the complaint fails at the first hurdle.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- No action to be taken on the domain name registration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment