Matthews (t/a Anton Motors) v. Smith & Ors [2001] UKEAT 131_00_2301 (23 January 2001)
The dismissals were for redundancy, not for a transfer-related reason, and liability for those dismissals remained with Mr Matthews and did not transfer under the Regulations.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 131_00_2301
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Matthews; Respondents: Anton Motors Employees
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Wrongful Dismissal, Transfer of Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr Matthews
Appellant
Anton Motors Employees
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether dismissals were for redundancy or transfer-related reasons under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981
- 2 Whether liability for dismissal transferred to employees under the Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The dismissals were for redundancy, not for a transfer-related reason, and liability for those dismissals remained with Mr Matthews and did not transfer under the Regulations.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Tribunal's decision stands; Mr Matthews remains liable for redundancy and wrongful dismissal payments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment