McFarlane v Rendel Palmer & Tritton [1996] UKEAT 1032_95_0606 (6 June 1996)
The tribunal acted within its discretion in striking out the appellant's claim after repeated, clear, and patient warnings and orders for further particulars were disregarded or refused by the appellant, making it impossible to do justice between the parties.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 1032_95_0606
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr McFarlane; Respondent: Rendel, Palmer & Tritton
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Striking Out of Originating Application and Refusal to Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Bad Faith, Procedural Compliance, Striking Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr McFarlane
Appellant
Rendel, Palmer & Tritton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Striking Out of Originating Application and Refusal to Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal properly exercised its discretion in striking out the appellant's originating application for failure to provide further particulars
- 2 Whether the refusal to review the striking out order was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal acted within its discretion in striking out the appellant's claim after repeated, clear, and patient warnings and orders for further particulars were disregarded or refused by the appellant, making it impossible to do justice between the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment